NACE UPDATE

The almost bi-weekly newsletter for Board members & Committee Chairs

June 20, 2008- Volume 08 Number 13

 (Note: Sources of information include the AASHTO Journal, NACo staff, Senate and House publications, the Federal Highway Administration, and other association news journals)

 

Contact your Senators to Urge Support the Baucus-Grassley-Murray Trust Fund Proposal

URGENT LEGISLATIVE ALERT
Contact your Senators today and urge them to support the Baucus-Grassley-Murray $8 billion Highway Trust Fund Proposal in the must-pass Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Extension bill.   Forecasts indicate a shortfall of several billion dollars to the Highway Trust Fund in FY 2009, the last year of SAFETEA-LU. In addition, the Federal Highway Administration recently reported that estimated miles traveled on U.S. public roads dropped 11 billion miles between March 2007 and March 2008, the first year-to-year reduction since 1979. As Americans drive less and purchase less fuel, the Highway Trust Fund’s shortfall will continue to worsen.  The upcoming Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) extension bill, expected to be considered in the Senate within the next few weeks, provides an opportunity to fix the Highway Trust Fund. FAA taxes and expenditure authority expire June 30, and Congress must pass an FAA extension before then.  Additional background is provided in the next item.

HOW TO SEND YOUR MESSAGE
Visit the NACo website to determine the email address of your Senator. http://capwiz.com/naco/dbq/officials/  Then send the following or similar personalized letter via email to your Senator.

Dear Senator (Name):

As a constituent and member of the National Association of County Engineers, I urge your support for the Baucus-Grassley-Murray proposal to replenish the Highway Trust Fund  when the Senate considers the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Extension Bill (H.R. 3540).

The Highway Trust Fund faces a short fall of several billion dollars in FY 2009. Congress must act quickly to prevent catastrophic program cuts to state and local transportation programs of more than 30 percent, from $41.2 billion this year to $27.2 billion next year.  

These cuts could not come at worse time.  They will result in job losses totaling 380,000.  Moreover, rising materials costs and falling revenues are placing an ever greater strain on state and local governments’ ability to improve safety, relieve congestion and improve aging roads, bridges and public transportation systems. 

The Baucus-Grassley-Murray proposal will transfer $8 billion from the General Fund to the Highway Trust Fund to ensure sufficient funding to keep the Trust Fund solvent, funds which were previously taken from the Trust Fund. Because the proposed transfer is intergovernmental, the Congressional Budget Office indicates that this fix does not constitute a spending outlay, and thus would not violate pay-go.

Thank you for your continued support for our nation’s public infrastructure.

Sincerely,
(Your Name and Address)

 

With Time Running Out, Trust Fund Fix Gains Momentum

The Senate Finance Committee and Senate appropriators turned up the heat on efforts to solve the $3.3 billion shortfall in the Highway Trust Fund, warning that unless action is taken, highway spending may have to be cut by one-third in the FY 2009 transportation appropriations bill awaiting markup the first week of July. Senator Max Baucus (D-MT), Chair of the Senate Finance Committee, and Senator Charles Grassley (R- IA), Ranking Member of Finance, are leading efforts to shore-up the Highway Account of the Highway Trust Fund and prevent the substantial program cuts. Senator Patty Murray (D-OR), Chair of the Transportation Appropriations Subcommittee, and Senator Robert Byrd, Chair of the full Appropriations Committee, joined them to push for immediate action by the Senate. The $3.3 billion shortfall projected in the President’s budget in February would result in a program cut of $13.5 billion in federal-aid highway funding, because of the way in which highway funding is expended. This 34 percent reduction in the federal highway program would put 380,000 jobs in jeopardy. Senators Baucus and Grassley had initially proposed reimbursing the Trust Fund by some $5 billion from the general fund. But the Senate was unable to move the Federal Aviation Administration reauthorization to which the Highway Trust Fund remedy was attached. With nationwide travel declining in the wake of high gas prices, the senators are now concerned that $5 billion may not be sufficient to cover a growing shortfall. They hope now to include as much as $8 billion for the Trust Fund as a part of must-pass revenue legislation to extend aviation taxes which will expire on June 30. In a letter to all members of the U.S. Senate on Thursday, AASHTO President Pete Rahn, Director of the Missouri Department of Transportation, said that a 34 percent cut in federal highway funding “would be a devastating loss to the states in terms of safety, jobs and economic activity… This would be an unacceptable blow to already struggling state economies.” Rahn urged Senate members “to support the proposed fix to the FY 2009 Highway Trust Fund shortfall.”

 

Transportation Appropriations Reported in House

The House Transportation, Housing and Urban Development and Related Agencies Subcommittee marked up the fiscal 2009 transportation appropriations bill today, setting the highway obligation limitation at $40.198 billion and providing some $10.278 billion for transit. Full details of the spending bill are unlikely to be available until the full committee markup which is scheduled for next Thursday. Highlights of the spending package, as reported in the Transportation Weekly today, are as follows:

Aviation – Airport Improvement Program obligation limitation is proposed for $3.515 billion. Total funding for the Federal Aviation Administration is proposed at $15.372 billion.

Highways – The FY 2009 obligation limitation is set at $40.198 billion, which matches the level guaranteed in SAFETEA-LU authorizing legislation, but which represents a reduction from the $40.216 billion obligation limitation in FY 2008. While the FY 2008 bill included $631 million in obligation limitation in revenue aligned budget authority (RABA), the proposed FY 2009 bill contains a $1.001 billion reduction in obligation authority due to reduced revenue in the Highway Trust Fund. The bill also proposes a $3.15 billion rescission of state highway contract authority balances. In FY 2008, the appropriators rescinded $4.1 billion in highway contract authority.

Transit – Programs of the Federal Transit Administration are funded at the $10.278 billion level contained in SAFETEA-LU. Formula and Bus Grants would be set at $8.361 billion and Capital Grants or new starts would receive $1.809 billion.

Rail – The proposed bill would provide $1.439 billion for Amtrak. The new capital grants program for states for intercity passenger rail is proposed at $60 million.

Safety – The bill would provide some $856 million for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration is funded at $541 million.

 

Committee Examines Ideas for New Infrastructure Financing

The House Transportation & Infrastructure Committee dove into four specific proposals for increasing investment in the nation’s infrastructure, examining ideas such as creating a development corporation and national infrastructure bank, taxing imports and exports to pay for better freight movement into and out of ports, and tasking a commission with creating “a new national vision for public infrastructure investment.” Tuesday’s hearing followed a May 8 joint meeting with the Budget Committee during which representatives began examining future ways to pay for building and maintaining roads, bridges, public transportation, airports, ports, waterways, and other infrastructure. Rep. James Oberstar (D-MN), who chairs the transportation committee, said the series of hearings “is part of a continuing conversation” with a goal of outlining the next major surface transportation reauthorization bill before the next administration takes office in January. Current federal transportation programs are authorized through September 2009. “You’ve given us a real financial investment map by which to make judgments in the future,” Oberstar said in concluding the three-hour hearing where four members presented their bills and a panel of four experts offered advice. The bills examined:

National Infrastructure Bank Act (HR 3401), sponsored by Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN), would establish a National Infrastructure Bank as a federal government entity to finance publicly sponsored projects of regional and national significance. The bank would be authorized to issue up to $60 billion in infrastructure bonds guaranteed by the United States. Its board of directors would select projects for funding and develop an appropriate financing package consisting of grants, direct loans, loan guarantees, or project-specific bonds.

National Infrastructure Development Act (HR 3896), sponsored by Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT), would establish the National Infrastructure Development Corp. The corporation would receive $9 billion in initial capitalization from the federal government over its first three years. It would serve as a national revolving fund to facilitate the financing of infrastructure projects that could be self-sustaining based on user charges or other dedicated revenue.

On-Time Act (HR 5102), sponsored by Rep. Ken Calvert (R-CA), would assess an infrastructure tax on all imported and exported goods. Revenue collected from the new fee would be used to fund projects in the transportation trade corridor for that particular port. Project selection authority would rest with state transportation departments. Calvert estimates the money collected would total $63 billion over the next decade.

U.S. Commission on Rebuilding America for the 21st Century Act (HR

5976), sponsored by Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR), would create a 17- member commission to hold at least 50 public hearings across the country to identify priority infrastructure needs and articulate a national vision for such investments. Oberstar called the four ideas “splendid” but did express skepticism about the need for a lengthy commission study, noting most states have already identified their pressing infrastructure needs. He noted the United States needs a long-term commitment to crucial national projects such as the 27-member European Union has done on that continent with a $350 billion effort to construct 30 major projects. “We have to go into this with a clear commitment as Europe did,” said Oberstar, who spoke to European transportation ministers last month at their annual meeting. “We haven’t had the political will at the White House in the last eight years to make those bold investments that we need.” Rep. John Mica (R-FL), the panel’s ranking minority member, agreed the country needs a strategic infrastructure plan but said the problem with the ideas presented was the low

dollar amounts they encompassed. “Some of the proposals offered by my colleagues are quite modest,” Mica said. “We have to look at all of the above when it comes to financing. We’ve got an incredible backlog of needs.” A dozen other committee members questioned the bill sponsors on details of their proposals. Members from both parties appeared to share a consensus that more money and new financing mechanisms must be part of the next transportation reauthorization. “We might have differences on a lot of things, but this is an area where we have so many similarities,” said Rep. Shelley Capito (R-WV). The Committee also heard from a panel of finance experts at the hearing including Everett Ehrlich, President, ESC Company; Mark Florian, Managing Director, Goldman, Sachs and Company; Dr. Rudolph Penner, The Urban Institute; and Bernard Schwartz, Chairman, BLS Investments, LLC.

 

Oberstar: Gas Tax Still Viable, But Supplements Needed

The chairman of the House Transportation & Infrastructure Committee said this week he sees a need for a “two-tier approach” to raising money for future projects: maintaining the federal gasoline tax as the “cornerstone of financing through the Highway Trust Fund” but also identifying supplemental revenue sources such as charging a fee based on trip length and vehicle weight. “This affects the stress put on the infrastructure—the roadways and the bridges— better than the amount of fuel purchased times cents per gallon,” Rep. James Oberstar (D-MN) said Tuesday at a committee hearing examining new ideas for infrastructure financing. “It’s a tantalizing proposal that in addition to a user fee—the gas tax—that we charge by vehicle miles traveled, and to which I would add, weight.” Oberstar offered his comments in response to a panel of four financing experts who testified to the committee. They urged Congress to focus on alternative sources of funding as it considers reauthorizing federal transportation programs next year, including charges for VMT, weight, tolls, and congestion fees. “The fuel tax, administered through the Highway Trust Fund, has served our country well since 1956,” said Mark Florian, managing director and head of infrastructure banking at Goldman, Sachs, & Co. and a member of the National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission. “Nevertheless, this source of funds is no longer sufficient to meet the large and growing needs for transportation infrastructure development in the United States.” The federal gas tax of 18.4 cents per gallon was last increased in 1993. Witnesses told the panel they should be concerned about dropping gas-tax revenue as high fuel prices—the national average for regular unleaded topped $4 per gallon this week for the first time— produce a drop in driving and lead to purchases of more fuel-efficient vehicles. Projections show the Highway Trust Fund will not collect enough money to cover transportation expenditures authorized through next year. “It is imprudent to rely primarily on a funding source that is tied principally to fuel consumption, given the reality of Americans reducing their consumption of gas with more efficient cars,” Florian said, “or cars that don’t even use gas at all in the coming years.”

EPA Issues Final Rule Exempting Water Transfers from Federal Permits
On June 9, 2008, the U.S. EPA Administrator signed the Final Water Transfer Rule, which exempts those seeking water conveyances from one U.S. water body to another U.S. water body from having to obtain a permit under the Clean Water Act's (CWA) National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. The rule has been submitted to the Federal Register for publication and an unofficial version of the rule is available at www.epa.gov/npdes/agriculture. Environmental groups have vowed to challenge the rule.

 

New Signal Timing Manual Ready for Free Download

The FHWA Office of Operations has issued The Signal Timing Manual, the first comprehensive guide to current practices related to traffic signal timing.  Property timed signals save gas by keeping traffic moving smoothly.  All the elements of signal timing, from policy and funding considerations to timing plan development, assessment, and maintenance are covered.  The manual is the culmination of research into practices across North America and serves as a reference for a range of practitioners, including traffic engineers, signal technicians, design engineers, teachers, and university students.  It is available at http://www.signaltiming.com

 

America’s Traffic Congestion Nightmare

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) President Pete Rahn is very concerned about what he describes as a "cliff ahead" for transportation. In a candid one-on-one interview Rahn assesses the future of transportation and the growing problem of traffic congestion in America.  Watch Pete Rahn's entire interview on YouTube at http://youtube.com/watch?v=zG5iLMYF3wA

 

National Sign Maintenance and Management Workshop Set for October

ATSSA – in partnership with the FHWA and NACE – will host a National Sign Maintenance and Management Workshop in Addison (Dallas County), Texas, Oct. 20-21. Twenty exhibitors will display the latest in sign technology during the two-day event, which will also feature many informative workshops, including discussions on new retroreflectivity requirements, sign management and maintenance research methods, funding, and implementation perspectives at the city, county and state levels. The workshops will be led by guest speakers from the federal, state and local levels, as well as industry professionals who specialize in a wide variety of signage issues. Preliminary information regarding this event, including names of guest speakers and timelines for workshops and exhibit hours, is available by clicking here.

 

Manager Guide to Roadside Revegetation using Native Plants Issued

The FHWA web site at http://www.wfl.fhwa.dot.gov/td/revegetation.htm has links to two publications on revegetating with native plants.

 

SAFETY RESEARCH ON HIGHWAY INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPERATIONS: IMPROVING PRIORITIES, COORDINATION, AND QUALITY

http://www.trb.org/news/blurb_detail.asp?id=9151

TRB Special Report 292, Safety Research on Highway Infrastructure and Operations: Improving Priorities, Coordination, and Quality recommend the creation of an independent scientific advisory committee (SAC).  The SAC would be charged with development of a transparent process for identifying and prioritizing research needs and opportunities in highway safety, with emphasis on infrastructure and operations, and using the process developed to recommend a national research agenda focused on highway infrastructure and operations safety.  The report also explores opportunities to improve the quality of highway safety research.

 

HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL DATA NEEDS GUIDE

http://www.trb.org/news/blurb_detail.asp?id=9149

TRB's National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Research Results Digest 329: Highway Safety Manual Data Needs Guide is designed to help potential users of the 1st edition of the Highway Safety Manual (HSM) anticipate the data needs for using the HSM.  The guide focuses on the data needed to use the HSM Part C methodologies for rural two-lane highways, rural multilane highways, and urban and suburban arterials. The guide provides information designed to help potential HSM users assess whether their existing data sources contain the data needed to apply the HSM safety prediction methodologies to highways of interest.